How Atul Kochhar became a victim of Islamist-Liberal nexus?

atul kochhar, islamists, liberals
  • 2.4K
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    2.4K
    Shares

Dubai based Celebrity Chef Atul Kochhar would not even have imagined in his wildest dream that he would become the next victim of the liberal fascism and Islamist-liberal nexus when he tweeted, “It’s sad to see that you have not respected the sentiments of Hindus who have been terrorized by Islam over 2000 years.” Exceptthe period mentioned, his statement is factually correct. He made this tweet in response to Priyanka Chopra’s infamous Quantico episode where Hindus bearing Rudrakash were shown as terrorists planning to bomb the New York’s Manhattan and frame Pakistanis for the terrorist attack.  But according to liberal and secular standards, Atul Kochhar’s tweet is anti-Islamic and he is an Islamophobe. Liberals and Islamist hounded him for exercising his freedom of speech and expression and speaking the truth. Because of his tweet, he lost his job. JW Marriott hotel terminated all their ties with Atul Kochar. This is akin to a Jew getting sacked for mentioning about the Holocaust, a black losing his job for speaking about slavery. In India, Islamists and their liberal fanboys will declare Jews anti-Nazi and anti-German for speaking about Holocaust and black as racists for speaking against slavery.

Because of the terror apologists masquerading as journalists now Atul Kochar’s life is in danger as he could also face prosecution and imprisonment under UAE’s draconian apostasy laws. The Islamists, by playing the victim card and political correctness card, have carried out terrorization about which celebrated chef Atul Kochhar was talking about, on Atul Kochhar himself. Calling a spade a spade is bigotry for the tribe of liberals, Communists, Seculars and Lutyens’ media.

Islamist lobby, by ganging up against Atul Kochhar, only proved his point right. It is no secret that Islamic invaders killed millions of Hindus, burnt scriptures, destroyed thousands of temples, and forcibly converted millions of Hindus. It is well recorded in the history books by historians who are not apologist of Islamists. Irony is that people of same religion without any shame give lectures to others on tolerance, peace and humanity.

People who point out the religious affiliation of these terror attacks and what is motivating them to carry out the terrorist attack are thrown behind the bars. Tommy Robinson has been thrown behind the bars for launching a movement against a group of Muslims accused of pedophilia, forced conversions, kidnapping and rape. Ironically, he is labeled as Islamophobe for exposing these despicable crimes.

The case of Atul Kochhar shows nauseating double standard of the liberal world. When you make any factually correct statement about Islam, you are labelled as an Islamophobe. But when you speak against Hinduism, even in derogatory terms, you get a certificate of secularism, rationalism, champion of human rights etc. If you disagree with their narrative they will make sure you lose your job and your career gets destroyed. Atul Kochhar, even after apologizing for his tweet, is still hounded by the liberals and Islamists which goes on to show that real bigots are these Liberals and Islamists and not Atul Kochhar. Lutyens’ media, even after spreading fake news that a nun was raped in West Bengal by Hindus, fake attack on church in Delhi, semen filled balloon, Dalit being killed for buying horse, Junaid lynching case, women raped in UP for eating beef and many other countless times, get away without apologizing. On the other hand Atul Kochhar could face prosecution even after issuing an unconditional apology.

This is what happens when we tolerate the intolerant. Unlimited tolerance leads to the disappearance of tolerance. This quote of Karl Popper perfectly sums up what will happen if we tolerate the intolerant. According to him, “Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies, as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force, for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument. They may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.”

The time has come to be intolerant. Intolerant against liberal fascism, against Islamist-liberal nexus and the terror apologists who have made it their crusade to defend those who must not be defended and crucify those who question them.

Comments

Previous «
Next »
Shubham Singh

21, (BA) Political Science Hons, PG Diploma in RTV, Learner.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *